MacBook Pro Creative Pro tests the value of the M1 Max chip issue

While Apple’s M1 Max chip is touted as being twice as fast as the M1 Pro, a series of creative MacBook Pro tests suggest that the real benefits of the leading chip may be much more limited than it is. ‘seems even relatively demanding. use.

There are specific tasks that see a significant difference. If you’re editing ProRes video or working with Apple’s Metal graphics API, the more powerful chip has a clear advantage. But this is not the case for many creative tasks …

CNET Dan Ackerman relied on a combination of benchmark testing and actual use to draw his conclusions.

He said the M1 Max certainly benefits some users.

To target the GPU differences between the M1 Pro and the M1 Max, I performed a few cross-platform GPU tests. In the GeekBench 5 compute test using Metal, Apple’s graphics API, there is a clear difference, with the M1 Max getting a much higher score. The same has happened in Wildlife Extreme, the only benchmark within the larger 3D Mark tool that runs on M1 Macs, as well as Windows, iOS, and other platforms. There the M1 Max tied with a new Razer Blade 14 with the Nvidia RTX 3080 GPU. Between the Max and the Pro was an older gaming laptop with an Nvidia RTX 2080 Max-Q.

Also, if you want to use your Mac for other activities while it performs intensive tasks, you might find the machine more responsive.

I spoke to another Brooklyn resident Joseph Ibrahim who specializes in VFX lighting and invited him to try the 14in MacBook Pro with the M1 Pro chip and the 16in M1 Pro with the M1 Max chip. . He rendered a scene in Houdini 3D design and animation software and found that the actual render time was the same on the M1 Pro and M1 Max, but […] the M1 Max system felt a lot more responsive than the M1 Pro when using the software and it left the demo session ready to purchase a fully upgraded MacBook Pro M1 Max.

But others may see less of a difference.

As a mainstream user who enjoys video editing, 3D modeling, and Photoshop / Illustrator projects, I struggled to find a difference in performance during my early days with these systems. This included the standard benchmarks we usually use as a first step in evaluating a computer’s capabilities, including GeekBench 5, Cinebench R23, and an 8K Premiere Quick Render Test I ran.

For more casual video editors, he even thinks it’s worth sticking with the M1 chip.

My other tip is that for people like me who are new to high-end creative apps for basic video editing, the M1 powered MacBook Air, 13in MacBook Pro, or 24in iMac are fine even for 4K video editing. Like I said in my 16in MacBook Pro review, if you just want a new MacBook Pro for the updated design, webcam, or ports, then you know you’re doing what is essentially a vanity purchase.

Of course, even a relatively small payout can justify the purchase for creative professionals for whom the chip price difference is insignificant compared to the value of their time.

Photo: Alexander Vlad/Unsplash

FTC: We use automatic affiliate links which generate income. Following.


Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:


Source link

Comments are closed.